[ad_1]
• FCS Standout, Isaiah DavisThe 2023 – ‘Made Waves in the World’ It is important to note that the word “you” means “you”. South Dakota State This list is dominated by the back, which has been rated highest in several categories including red zone grade, goal to go rushing grade, and overall grade.
• Scheme fit will prove pivotal: Although there aren’t any clear-cut running backs at the top of this class, all have unique skills that can flourish in certain roles and situations.
• Draft and trade for yourself: Try PFF’s Mock Draft Simulation — trade picks and players and mock for your favorite NFL team.
Time to read: Estimated 6 minutes
More Draft Tools are available by clicking here:
Mock Draft 2024 Simulator | 2024 Big Board | The Draft Guide for 2024
The 2024 player profiles | The 2024 Draft | NCAA Premium Stats
You can also find out more about the following: NFL Draft The NFL Combine and the individual Pro Days are behind us. The players bring their own unique skills to the table and hope to be called up on the main stage. For a better understanding of NFL prospects, we are breaking down each draft class’s best players for every facet and position.
The PFF has rated the top running backs in each of its key aspects. NFL Draft in 2024:
Inside Zone Grade Audric Estime, Notre Dame (90.7)
Second-team PFF All-American He has a good power profile and also a great vision. This allows him to be successful running inside zone downhill. Estime ran inside zone for over 40% of his attempts, and generated over 76.4% after contact. He also forced 0.38 missed tackles on each attempt. This was the most of any prospect who had at least 50 interior zone attempts.
Outside Zone Grade: Isaiah Davis, South Dakota State (90.4)
FCS star Davis was extremely effective at reading his blocking, picking attack lanes and executing outside zone concepts. Davis was able to gain an incredible 7.5 yards on each carry, and he also scored a touchdown or first down in over 29.7% his attempts outside the zone.
Man/Gap Grade: Kimani Vidal, Troy (91.6)
Vidal (85) was the running back with most gap concepts in his class. TroyVidal was a very effective rusher in this concept. He used his vision and short-area acceleration, as well as a variety of other moves, to get past defenders. He has forced 33 missed tackles and had 16 runs that were 10 or more yard on gap concepts. This is more than twice as many as the next most productive player in the draft class of 2024.
Power Grade Isaiah Davis, South Dakota State (92.1)
Davis displayed the ability to stay patient and wait for his blocking skills to mature before exploding into creases. Davis’ approach fit South Dakota State’s scheme that was heavily based on power. Davis had a success rate of 10.3 percent or greater in his rushes. This explosiveness allowed Davis to achieve a 54.7% rate of first downs/touchdowns on power runs. That was the highest rookie prospect.
Counter Grade Bucky Irving, Oregon (94.5)
Junior backs out of Oregon The former was a standout when it came to counter-concepts, as he amassed over 547 yard and scored four touchdowns. He dominated the class by far. Irving erupted on counters generating 8.7 yards per carry, 5.8 of which came after contact — both of which lead all draft-eligible backs.
The grade of Pull Lead is: Trey Benson, Florida State (89.3)
Benson only carried 12 times behind the pull-lead system, but he excelled, displaying his amazing athleticism. Florida State rarely deployed pull-leads – just 29 all season – but when established into the gameplan, Benson took full advantage. An example? Take FSU’s match with in Week 6. Virginia TechBenson’s explosive run totaled three runs of over 40 yards each.
Last-Down Rushing Grade with Only Four Yards Left: Dylan Laube, New Hampshire (90.6)
Laube was the FCS’s second standout on this list. He excelled in situations requiring short yardage and late downs. New Hampshire’s back has only been stopped twice on his 12 attempts to carry the ball four-yards or less in third or fourth downs. In contrast, the New Hampshire back converted on 75 percent of his attempts and averaged 8.7 yards per attempt.
The Goal-To Go Rushing Grade is: Isaiah Davis, South Dakota State (84.5)
Davis was often used as the primary goal-to go threat by Jackrabbits, who were rewarded with his excellent performance. Davis scored 14 touchdowns rushing near the goalline, which is the best conversion rate among the prospects this year.
The overall Redzone grade: Isaiah Davis, South Dakota State (86.5)
Davis is nearly impossible to stop for FCS defences when it comes to the red zone. South Dakota State’s back scored on 51.3% more of his attempts within the 20-yard zone, primarily because he was successful in 0.26 missed tackles for every attempt.
Receiving Grade Dylan Laube, New Hampshire: 90.4
It is important to note that the word “you” means “you”. New Hampshire The product had the highest number of receiving snaps (362) among all the backs, and was the only one to finish with a PFF grade above 80.0 at this position. Laube accumulated over 700 yard after the catch. This contributed to his 1.96 yards for every route run. Both of these numbers are amongst the best in this year’s group.
Pass-Blocking Grade: Jonathon Brooks, Texas: 88.5
Brooks did not play as much pass protection snaps in his class as the other backs. However, his production speaks for itself. Longhorns running back demonstrated the footwork and strength needed to become a reliable blocker in college. Brooks allowed no pressures despite being beaten only once on 48 pass-blocking snaps.
[ad_2]
