[ad_1]
• LSU‘s Malik Nabers The truth is almost indiscernible: SEC’s dynamic standout is first in many categories. These include PFF receiving grades vs. single-coverage, and receiving grades on deep targets.
• Ohio State‘s Marvin Harrison Jr. When you need to be clutch, it is essential. Biletnikoff Award winners 2023 are at the top in two crucial categories: red-zone grades, and receiving late grades.
• Try PFF’s Mock Draft Simulator: Your favorite NFL team can be drafted by trading players, picks or drafts.
Estimated Reading Time: 5 Minutes
More Draft Tools are available by clicking here:
Mock Draft 2024 Simulator | 2024 Big Board | Guide Draft 2024
The 2024 player profiles | 2020 Mock Drafts | NCAA Premium Stats
You can also find out more about the following: NFL Draft in 2024 Season is in full swing, and the NFL Scouting Combine Individual pro days are now in the past.
Each player has a different set of skills. The best NFL players are broken down by position, and we will do this to give you a better understanding of them.
PFF’s top-rated wide receivers are listed below in all of the key aspects.
Receiver Grade arranged at the outside receiver
Hayden Hatten, Idaho: 91.4
Idaho’s FCS-star has earned receiving grades of 90.0 and above in consecutive seasons. Outside receiver was his preferred position, as he played 68.7% his career snaps there.
Hatten’s average distance per run outside was 3.06 in 2023. This is the best mark of all wide receivers who qualified. Hatten had 27 receptions that were 15 yards or longer and he caught 47.8% his targets.
The slot for receiving the grade
Malik Nabers, LSU: 92.6
Prospects ranked fourth and fifth He showed off his versatility, by playing all over the pitch in 2023. His average distance run per route was 4.35, more than any other prospect with at least 100 snaps in the slot.
Teammate He Brian Thomas Jr. The only players who have a passer rating of 154.0 or higher when aimed from the slot are these prospects.
Short targets: Receiving Grade
Malik Washington, Virginia: 90.7
VirginiaSlot specialist’s was almost automatic when targeting between 1 and nine yards downfield. He hauled 86.4%, which is the highest rate amongst all receiver prospects with at least 25 opportunities.
Receiving grade on intermediate targets
Xavier Legette, South Carolina: 94.0
You can also find out more about the following: South Carolina Receivers caught all of their intermediate targets. They are one of two prospects to have done this on at least 20 targets.
Receive a grade for deep targets
Malik Nabers, LSU: 97.8
Nabers was able to take advantage of the corners by using his double-moves to enter and exit breaks. This allowed him to make 19 receptions from passes that were thrown at least 20 yards away. The average reception was 32.8 yards and he generated a passer rating of 148.3 when he was targeted.
Late Downs: Receiving a Grade
Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State & Malik Washington, Virginia: 89.3
Harrison showed off his clutch gene throughout the season by making critical grabs during high-stakes, late-down scenarios. Harrison led the class with seven touchdowns in third- and fourth-down situations. In addition, he had nine receptions over 15 yards and averaged 3.29 yard per route run.
Washington led the group with 33 receptions in situations of late-downs. Washington was the class leader in terms of volume, with 33 receptions and 22 first-down conversions. Virginia Strong hands allowed receiver to capture 85.7% of the targets that he contested.
Receiving Grades on Contested Targets
Rome Odunze, Washington: 95.2
A projected early first round pick, the player has excellent play strength as well as hands which allow him to catch balls with ease.
Odunze was able to secure 75% of the targets he faced and topped his class in the end with 21 receptions contested, of which 19 were for first downs or touchdowns.
Receiving Grade vs. One-time coverage
Malik Nabers, LSU: 95.3
LSU’s standout receiver produced a receiving score that was two points better than the nearest competitor. Nabers’ ability to force the first defender to miss is what sets him apart. He forced an impressive eight missed tackles against single coverage.
Receiving Grade vs. Zone coverage
Malik Washington, Virginia: 91.5
You can expect a lot from slot specialists. Washington It is extremely adept at finding spaces to work under and through zones. These looks are not suitable for these styles. Washington The rookies were able to record 78 receptions and 873 yards.
The Red Zone Receiving Grade
Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State: 87.8
Harrison led all prospects this year with 10 touchdowns on receptions inside the 20-yard mark.
[ad_2]
