[ad_1]
Referee Darren England, this weekend will act as a Video Assistant Referee in the Premier League First time after being involved Luis DíazGoal incorrectly disallowed by Liverpool‘s 2-1 defeYou can also check out our other articles. at Tottenham The 30th of September is a day to remember.
England will be serving as video referee in Sunday’s clash between West Ham United The following are some examples of how to get started: Fulham At the London Stadium, it has been over six months since his previous appointment.
England was removed from his duties for a few weeks after the incident and then returned to the role of fourth official. BrentfordThe home match of against Burnley The 23rd of October is a holiday.
– Stream on ESPN+: LaLiga, BundesligaMore (U.S.A.)
PGMOL has described this mistake as a “significant error by a human being.” After the mistake, it was almost three months until England officiated another Premier League match. Luton Town The following are some examples of how to get started: Newcastle United On Dec. 23, he was in charge of just two matches, and only until Feb. 10, he had been the referee for nine Championship games. England referred nine Championship matches, as well as three FA Cup games.
In the Premier League over the past two months, England was re-assigned to six games.
Michael Oliver acted as the VAR support in each of those two FA Cup matches. Two referees are in the video centre for all FA Cup matches. England appointed the referee for the fifth-round match between AFC Bournemouth Chelsea and Leicester City quarterfinals last month.
Premier League announces Thursday that Next season, it will implement semi-automated offside VAR technology (SAOT).. However, the error on the Díaz goal was primarily around communication rather than the technology, an issue SAOT would not be able to fix though the removal of the manual process should reduce the pressure on the VAR.
The Premier League Independent Key Match Incidents Panel unanimously backed the decision not to allow Wolverhampton Wanderers‘ late equaliser against West Ham last weekend.
Max Kilman In the ninth minute, Tony Harrington did a video review at the pitchside monitor and ruled the goal out as offside. Wolves’ Tawanda Chirewa The goalkeeper was surrounded by a crowd of people. Lukasz Fabianski When Kilman heads the ball toward goal.
Gary O’Neil, Wolves’ manager said: “It’s a horrible decision” after the match. “It’s possibly the worst thing I’ve seen.” “If you are a novice to the game, it’s possible that your understanding is poor and therefore you would conclude the player is onside.”
Wolves president Jeff Shi In a powerful statement, they questioned the VAR’s mandate.
ESPN has obtained the findings of an Independent Panel that state “Chirewa clearly is in an offside situation, directly in front of the goalkeeper, and very close by, all of which have a direct impact on the decision of the goalkeeper.” As the ball approaches the goal, there is contact between the attacker and the goalkeeper. The goalkeeper’s ability to react is limited.
Michael Oliver was unanimously found to have been wrong in his decision to dismiss Burnley’s Michael Keane. Dara O’Shea For denying a clear opportunity to score a goal. David Coote was deemed to have had a role in the 3-2 split vote.
It is obvious that the goalkeeper would win possession, and this was not an opportunity to score a goal,” said the panel.
Burnley chose to not appeal O’Shea’s yellow card and will suspend him for the home game this weekend. Brighton & Hove Albion.
Burnley has been the victim of VAR errors twice in just three matches. On March 30th, Chelsea A penalty was awarded. Lorenz Assignon Was sent for a challenging on Mykhailo MudrykThe panel voted 4-1 in favor of the VAR overturning the decision made by the referee Darren England.
Also, the panel voted 5 to 1. Sheffield United‘s Jack Robinson Robert Jones, the referee should have thrown out the players after they made a poor challenge. Cole PalmerThe VAR Paul Tierney received a 3 to 2 vote, indicating that he was incorrect in not sending referees to monitors.
This challenge is clearly dangerous to the opponent, and the situation could have been much worse if Palmer had not jumped to avoid it.
The panel believed that all other VAR decision were correct. Aston Villa Should have received a fine for Mathias JorgensenThe challenge of. Diego CarlosThe VAR was not able to intervene, even though the situation did not meet the minimum threshold.
Panel voted 4-1 against any VAR intervention in the case of violent conduct on Tottenham’s part. James MaddisOn, on Nottingham Forest‘s Ryan YatesThe evidence was not enough to establish that this error is obvious and clear.
The number of missed VAR Interventions this season is 23 compared with 24 in 2022-2023. It shows how difficult it can be to identify the threshold that defines a clear, obvious mistake. The number of incorrect interventions is down significantly, though, from 10 to five in this campaign.
It is composed of five people, three from each side, one representing the Premier League, and another two representatives. The panel was established at the beginning of the last season in order to provide an independent evaluation of decisions, rather than depending on PGMOL and the clubs. This judgement will provide an independent assessment of major match incidents.
[ad_2]
