2024 NFL Draft: Highest-graded red-zone receivers over previous two seasons | NFL Draft

• Kansas State tight finish Ben Sinnott paces the draft class: Ten of his 16 red-zone catches over the previous two seasons went for touchdowns.

• Marvin Harrison Jr. and Hayden Hatten match one another in red-zone landing grabs: Each secured 17 scores on red-zone targets over the previous two seasons.

• Draft and commerce for your self: Strive PFF’s Mock Draft Simulator — commerce picks and gamers and mock in your favourite NFL group.

Estimated Studying Time: 9 minutes

Click on right here for extra draft instruments:

2024 Mock Draft Simulator | 2024 Large Board | 2024 Draft Information
2024 Participant Profiles | 2024 Mock Drafts | NCAA Premium Stats

T-1. TE Ben Sinnott, Kansas State: 87.7 Receiving Grade

Ben Sinnott was Kansas State’s most-targeted receiver within the purple zone over the previous two seasons. Twelve of his 16 catches resulted in first downs, and he tied for the fifth-most landing catches over that span. Sinnott recorded 5 explosive good points of 15-plus yards (third most) and leads all draft-eligible gamers in red-zone passer score when focused (129.0).

T-1. WR Hayden Hatten, Idaho: 87.7 Receiving Grade

Hatten is the lone FCS participant on this record, and his red-zone manufacturing is sort of unmatched. He led the FCS in red-zone goal fee (32.7%) and tied for first amongst all draft-eligible gamers in touchdowns and first downs. A few of his greatest work got here on late-down red-zone performs, on which he noticed 15 targets and caught 9 landing passes (first). Hatten was focused 21 occasions from the intermediate space of the sphere (first), securing 9 catches and eight touchdowns. He led all gamers in common depth of goal (13.3 yards) and recorded six explosive good points from the purple zone.

T-3. WR Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State: 85.6 Receiving Grade

Marvin Harrison Jr. was the most-targeted 2024 NFL Draft prospect within the purple zone over the previous two seasons, and he led all draft-eligible gamers in menace fee (36.7%). He ranked second in receiving yards and tied with Hayden Hatten in touchdowns and first downs gained. Half of Harrison’s catches had been on late-down targets. He moved the chains every time and got here up with eight scores. He led FBS-eligible gamers in intermediate targets (19) and recorded seven good points of 15-plus yards (first).

T-3. WR Roman Wilson, Michigan: 85.6 Receiving Grade

Wilson was Michigan’s favourite red-zone goal over the previous two seasons (34.4% menace fee), producing a 113.7 passer score when focused. He caught 16 red-zone passes with 12 first-down good points and 9 touchdowns. Wilson averaged 2.34 yards per route run and ranked seventh in red-zone receiving yards. He recorded three good points of 15-plus yards and positioned third in deep goal fee (23.8%). Greater than half of his targets got here on early downs (13), the place he snagged 10 passes for 85 yards and 6 scores.

5. TE Jared Wiley, TCU: 82.2 Receiving Grade

Wiley led TCU with 15 red-zone catches over the previous two seasons. Most of his yards got here inside 9 yards of the road of scrimmage (55), however he nonetheless completed top-15 amongst draft-eligible gamers in touchdowns (9) and first-down receptions (11).

6. WR Malachi Corley, Western Kentucky: 79.5 Receiving Grade

Corley led all draft-eligible Group of 5 gamers in red-zone catches this previous season, securing 13 of his 15 such targets for 5 touchdowns and eight first downs. Defenders struggled to pin him down, as he recorded 100 yards after the catch (first) and 34 yards after contact (fourth) throughout two seasons. Most of his work got here behind the road of scrimmage, the place he noticed 15 targets and moved the chains seven occasions with six scores (first).

7. WR Malik Washington, Virginia: 77.4 Receiving Grade

Washington totaled 12 red-zone targets in his four-year run at Northwestern however surpassed that in 2023 at Virginia (20), main the ACC with 16 catches and 9 first-down good points. Washington caught 5 landing passes and compelled six missed tackles. He leads all draft-eligible receivers in missed tackles compelled since 2022 (eight).

8. WR Luke McCaffrey, Rice: 77.1 Receiving Grade

McCaffrey led all Group of 5 gamers in red-zone targets and catches over the previous two seasons whereas rating fifth total in receiving yards. He secured seven contested catches and recorded two good points of 15-plus yards over the span. Most of his work got here on early downs (25 targets), and he ranked third in targets inside 9 yards of the road of scrimmage.

9. WR Jacob Cowing, Arizona: 75.5 Receiving Grade

Jacob Cowing is tied for second with all draft-eligible gamers in red-zone targets over the previous two seasons after seeing solely 19 such targets throughout his three seasons at UTEP. He led the Pac-12 in landing catches this season (9) and ranked top-three in touchdowns and first-down good points since 2022. Cowing compelled six missed tackles and generated a 122.1 passer score when focused over the previous two seasons.

10. TE Brock Bowers, Georgia: 74.9 Receiving Grade

Bowers led all draft-eligible tight ends in red-zone targets and catches over the previous two seasons. Sixteen of his 18 catches gained first downs, and he generated a 105.9 passer score when focused. Bowers leads all SEC tight ends with 15 profession red-zone touchdowns and averaged 5.5 yards after the catch per reception.

11. WR Jalen McMillan, Washington: 74.4 Receiving Grade

McMillan handled a lingering knee harm for a lot of the 2023 season. He nonetheless managed to safe 9 of his 10 red-zone targets for 61 yards and 4 touchdowns whereas main the Huskies in menace fee (37.0%) and yards per route run (2.26). McMillan paced the group in red-zone catches and yards over the previous two seasons and ranked second in passer score when focused (126.1). He caught all seven of his targets behind the road of scrimmage and secured eight of 12 quick targets for 5 first downs and three scores. He caught 5 of his seven targets on the intermediate stage and scored on every play.

12. WR Adonai Mitchell, Texas: 74.3 Receiving Grade

Mitchell missed 9 video games as a result of harm in 2022 and noticed 10 red-zone targets throughout his time at Georgia. He caught six passes for 63 yards and 4 touchdowns, producing a 117.9 passer score when focused.

Texas utilized Mitchell extra in 2023, sending 15 red-zone targets his manner. He caught 10 of the passes for 89 yards and eight touchdowns, producing a team-high 94.2 passer score when focused. He ranked top-10 in touchdowns and first-down good points over the previous two seasons and transformed each profession red-zone catch into a primary down.

13. WR Zakhari Franklin, Ole Miss: 73.5 Receiving Grade

A knee harm restricted Franklin to 4 video games in 2023. He was twice focused within the purple zone, catching each and scoring as soon as. It was his first yr at Ole Miss after a four-year run at UTSA. Throughout his time there, he led the Roadrunners in catches (33), touchdowns (22) and menace fee (32.3%) within the purple zone. He recorded double-digit catches in 2021 and 2022 and scored eight occasions in each seasons.

14. TE Cade Stover, Ohio State: 72.5 Receiving Grade

Stover ranked fourth in goal fee for the Buckeyes over the previous two seasons (20.4%) but led the group in passer score when focused over that span (114.8). He hauled in 5 red-zone catches in 2023, all for first downs, and recorded 4 red-zone touchdowns in back-to-back seasons.

15. WR Brenden Rice, USC: 70.9 Receiving Grade

Rice caught 4 red-zone passes for 28 yards and two touchdowns throughout his time at Colorado (2020-2021). He led the Trojans in menace fee (40.5%) in 2023 and generated a 102.4 passer score when focused over the previous two seasons. Rice paced USC in red-zone yardage over the span however ranked within the backside 5 amongst draft-eligible gamers in the identical space. Thirty-nine of his red-zone receiving yards got here from scramble changes, and he caught simply one in every of seven contested targets in 2023.

16. WR Brian Thomas Jr., LSU: 70.3 Receiving Grade

Thomas led LSU in red-zone touchdowns in 2023 (six). He secured three of his 4 red-zone contested targets and completed with a 128.0 passer score when focused. Greater than half of Thomas’ manufacturing got here on submit and go routes. He secured all 5 of his such targets for 54 yards and scored on every. He compelled 5 profession missed tackles within the purple zone, as nicely.

17. WR Jamari Thrash, Louisville: 69.3 Receiving Grade

Thrash was Louisville’s most-targeted red-zone participant in 2023 (9), with most of his yardage coming off two deep catches that gained 32 yards. He noticed eight red-zone targets throughout his three seasons at Georgia State, catching six of these passes for 48 yards and 4 touchdowns.

18. WR Joshua Cephus, UTSA: 69.2 Receiving Grade

The fifth-year senior led UTSA in catches (eight), touchdowns (six) and goal fee (31.8%) within the purple zone in 2023. He ranked top-10 amongst draft-eligible gamers in landing catches and fourth in deep goal fee (21.7%) since 2022. Most of Cephus’ red-zone targets over the previous two seasons had been on slant (5) and nook (4) routes. He posted six mixed catches for 59 yards, with two good points of 15-plus yards and 5 touchdowns on such performs.

19. WR Troy Franklin, Oregon: 67.6 Receiving Grade

Franklin ran the second-most red-zone routes over the previous two seasons and tied for sixth in targets over that span. He caught 9 of 12 red-zone targets in 2023 for 69 yards and 6 touchdowns and led the Geese with 19 targets in 2022. Over the previous two seasons, Franklin secured 4 contested catches, compelled six missed tackles and recorded three good points of 15-plus yards within the purple zone.

20. Malik Nabers, LSU: 66.1 Receiving Grade

Nabers led LSU in catches (9), yards (76) and menace fee (35.2%) within the purple zone in 2023, but he ranked final on the group in catch fee (47.4%). Nabers recorded a 50% catch fee and an 83.8% goal fee from the purple zone over the previous two seasons. LSU tried to get him the ball on fade (5) and go (4) routes with little success (one catch for 20 yards). He was efficient near the road of scrimmage, catching eight of 9 short-area targets for 53 yards. He gained 5 first downs and scored thrice on these performs.